If I had a pound for every time I’ve heard a Chinese martial artist start to explain the history of their style in a way that means, by sheer coincidence, that their particular lineage is the most special and authentic example of all the different branches of their style, then I’d be as rich as a relative of a Conservative MP in 2020 with no previous experience of procuring PPE equipment.
So, what’s going on here? Obviously not every single Chinese martial artist you talk to can have the ultimate lineage of a style, so one of two things is happening here. Either, you’ve just happened to bump into that one guy on the planet who has the best version of this style known to mankind… Or, like most human beings, the person talking lacks the self awareness to see that they are parroting a line they’ve been sold, and that they’re now selling to you. Everybody likes to think that they are doing the real thing, and that means, that all the other people who do their martial art a bit differently to them therefore can’t also be doing the real thing. As a side note, I think the elaborate and fanciful origin stories of most Chinese martial arts serve a similar purpose – to make the students confident that their style is somehow better than the others.
The most recent example of this phenomina I’ve listened to was in an episode of a podcast featuring a Chen style lineage holder talking about why his style is the best. The whole episode is essentially about who has the real Chen style lineage – the Beijing Chen group or the Village Chen group. I don’t do Chen style myself, and don’t really have any desire to either, so I don’t have a dog in the fight, but listening to the long, convoluted reasoning he used to explain exactly why his lineage is better than the others, I do wonder if he’s ever stopped to listen to himself?
Martial arts styles are essentially brands, and everybody involved is selling you their particular brand in one way or another, whether they realise it or not. This is a cynical view to take on martial arts, I agree, but I think it’s also historically accurate. Martial arts styles only appeared in China the age of commercialism when people realised that it was possible to make money teaching them. Before that different styles didn’t necessarily have different names, or names at all. Once you could make money teaching it was necessary to differentiate your particular style from others, otherwise, how would you attract students?
I don’t mean to single out the Chen style guy – he’s not alone by a long stretch – but it seems to me that all Chinese martial artists have some version of the same story they tell themselves about why their lineage is the most special, unique or authentic. Heck, I used to be one of those guys myself!
This is usually the point where my very wise Polish BJJ friend taps me on the shoulder and reminds me with his usual Spartan brevity that the only reason lineage becomes important is because the art has died and nobody is using it to fight with any more.
Again, that sounds a bit harsh, but he could well be right. BJJ is a brand like any other martial arts, and very marketing heavy, but in BJJ circles people don’t tend to care about lineage in the way they do in Chinese martial arts because the art has a healthy competiton culture. Nobody would say things like, “This is not the real Rio De Janeiro style of jiujitsu”. They’d just get laughed out of town for saying that. In BJJ, if you can make a technique work in training, or even better, in competition, then it’s valid. There is no need for any other type of validation. If it works, it works. You are expected to add to it and innovate. I really like that. Sure, there are a few branches of the BJJ tree that venerate the original self-defence orientated teachings of Helio Gracie as if they were written in stone, and refuse to modernise for fear of losing their street effectiveness, but they’re not that big a deal in the great scheme of things. The rest of the BJJ world carefully steps around them so they can carry on living in the 1930s without affecting anybody else. It’s not a big problem.
Lineage is real. It exists. But surely, what matters more is what we can actually do with the art?
My question is always, “does it work?” If it does, I’m interested.
2 thoughts on “Lineage Queens”
I understand the sentiment of how everyone thinks their own lineage is the best. And I agree with the BJJ friend that lineage is important when the art is dying. And I do think that Taijiquan is a dying art.
But, in a dying art with poor quality control where just anyone can say they are a “Master” or “Grandmaster”, at the bare minimum, I think lineages help with crosses of elimination of which ones are working and which ones are not. It becomes less of a question of who is “The Best”, but a question of which ones have devolved and lost way too much content that it won’t work anymore.
Wouldn’t you want to know if lineage X comes from a history of learning applications and Tuishou for a summation of under 2 years? Isn’t <2 years… rather short?
Suppose you want to learn Taijiquan, but lineage X does not have a lot of Taijiquan applications, so they imported techniques from other martial arts and branded it as “Taijiquan”. Wouldn’t you want to know that they’re being dishonest and deceiving you?
And if someone were to ask you to compare lineages of a dying art, what would be the alternative to saying one is better than another? The alternative might be: Answer with political correctness and lie by saying everyone is equally great. Is that really a helpful and productive answer?
I suspect that the author has more of a problem with the condescending implications of so many people stating why one lineage is better than another. I think the discomfort is that it sounds very childish. It’s like a kid saying: “Ha! I have better grades than you do! Therefore, I am smarter than you!” It almost sounds adult-like and more professional to say: "We're all equally great! We're all equally talented and hard working!"
But on the other hand, if we move past that discomfort, we can then ask: well… why did this child get better grades than this other child?
I think the population of people who say that ‘all lineages are equally great’ far exceeds the population of ‘my lineage is better than your lineage’. On the Internet, I often see the argument that styles and lineage does not matter and that any differences you see between practitioners is purely trivial. And I think people like this belief a lot because it’s politically correct; it’s keeps everyone happy – including the conman.
Well… what If the differences we see can make applications better or worse? Wouldn't that be useful information?
Pingback: Lineage Queens | The Tai Chi Notebook - Abhishek Blog